CNN really should be getting paid as much as any Democratic operative because they surely appear to be doing all they can to promote Joe Biden.
Take this attempt, for instance.
A window into his soul? There is so much spin there, it would make you dizzy.
But it’s just because he cares so much, right?
For Biden, infrastructure is about far more than fixing America’s creaking and crumbling roads and bridges, airports and railroads that are often compared unfavorably to gleaming 21st century projects in developing countries like China. The program is the latest massively ambitious sign that he senses that fate, political circumstance and shifts in public opinion offer him a sudden but fleeting opening to accomplish his long-term political aim of improving the lives of American workers.
When they have to twist that much, you know it’s really awful.
Translation? They were contrary to President Donald Trump’s infrastructure bill because he wanted to actually address the infrastructure. They’re for Biden’s bill because it will’remake’ America with all kinds of things which have nothing whatever to do with infrastructure, but rather, is packaged with Democratic agenda items.
Now the spending is just staggering. The debt will be ineffective and the taxes will kill the market that Trump built.
But one of the worst things it will do is exactly what it will do to American employees. Improve the lives of American workers? It will do anything but.
Biden has already shown he not only doesn’t give a rip about American equilibrium or energy independence by killing the Keystone Pipeline, but that murdered tens of thousands of jobs that he didn’t appear to give a darn about.
That was bad enough. This will be far worse. Let’s just take one example in the bill — the PRO Act.
Dana Perino pointed out how this was a enormous attempt to usurp state’s rights and essentially obviate Right to Work laws, to conserve the unions and require people to pay union dues.
.@DanaPerino: “There is something in the bill called the Pro Act and that would basically end right to work in 27 states which basically means that keeps workers from having to pay union dues, basically. So, that's egregious…to use…a national bill to try to usurp state laws.” pic.twitter.com/w6aHyMzJgP— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) March 31, 2021
That, like HR 1’voting rights,’ it’s the Democrat’s way of imposing control nationally when they are not winning on the issues and in elections in the states. If you’re concerned about election security, HR 1 will impose every questionable action you’re concerned about: banning requiring voter IDs, allowing ballot harvesting, and so much more.
One of the worse things about the PRO Act and why we all should be standing up against it’s how it’s going to gut so many jobs. Millions of freelancers will probably lose their jobs if it passes — almost 60 million freelancer jobs would hang in the balance under this bill.
Following the pandemic lockdowns, many are fighting. What’s saved some people is the flexibility of freelancing. But this would ruin that, as my colleague Brandon Morse breaks down in this helpful video.
We’ve already seen how horrible it was for workers in California — it was so bad it combined all freelancers across the political spectrum against it, with many Democrats fighting it once they saw what it did. And this would be imposed nationally without a way to escape it.
We will need to do everything we can to raise our voices against it.
This former U.N. Ambassador wants America to save the world again
Former ambassador to the United Nations and administrator for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), Samantha Power recently expressed her wishes to bring back America’s prestige by administering vaccines all over the world. This ambitious goal requires the revival of USAID’s capacity and influence to help other nations recover from this pandemic.
Created in 1961 under the John F. Kennedy administration, USAID was an independent agency of the American Federal Government, tasked to deliver foreign aid, as well as development assistance. The agency has been a major force in providing disaster and poverty relief for low-income countries. USAID also focuses on environmental and world issues along with U.S. national interests and socioeconomic development. Unfortunately, USAID has lost much authority in the global arena after the 60’s, as governments started focusing on other
Last month, Samantha Power was confirmed as administrator for USAID through a 68-26 vote by the U.S. Senate. Even though this is her first time working for the agency, her experience in the humanitarian field and as a diplomat is most valuable for the government. Her wisdom working as a U.N. ambassador under Obama’s term, back to her beginnings as a war correspondent in Bosnia is a beacon of light in these dark times.
Power believes that this dream to, once again, bring American aid to poor nations could become true if USAID “is unleashed to design programs around getting vaccines into arms in countries where we’ve worked for generations, for 60 years.” She also believes that, unlike China which relies heavily on big funding, USAID will instead utilize a more grassroots approach.
The cooperation between the private sector and non-governmental organizations, will be a powerful force behind this project. Because America is a free country where information flows without oppressive regulations, the internet will be an important tool in disseminating information.
During her remarks at her USAID welcome ceremony, she shared her experiences and the struggles that she has witnessed all over the world. Citing America’s remarkable role during times of global adversity.
“I saw it firsthand during the Ebola outbreak that ravaged West Africa in 2014 and gripped the rest of the world in fear. It was America’s willingness to step into the breach and deploy a whole-of-government effort with USAID at its core that changed the world, that moved the world. Because America led, because USAID led, the United States was able to rally a coalition of 60 countries to contribute on the ground and secure 134 co-sponsors for a resolution at the UN Security Council, declaring the epidemic a threat to international peace and security,” Powers said in her speech last April.
This Democrat Thinks Defunding the Police is a Wrong Idea
The unfortunate events last May 25, 2020 which led to the death of George Floyd at the hands of a few irresponsible policemen, sparked an endless stream of protests on the streets. It was a chaotic season that has drowned out the underlying coronavirus crisis. Aside from the trending fad that is “Black Lives Matter,” the other famous battle cry was “defund the police.”
NY City mayoral candidate Andrew Yang said in a debate yesterday, that defunding the police isn’t the right approach in New York. He also stressed that these cops need to be told that their city needs them. Fair enough, America is full of good policemen and women on duty, doing their best to protect the citizens by being on the lookout for criminals. For Yang, removing the bad apples while giving the better ones the needed appreciation and motivation, is the correct thing to do.
“The first thing I’d do as mayor is go to our police force and say that ‘Your city needs you. Your city needs you to do your jobs professionally, responsibly and justly.’ But the police are going to be a core way for us to address the public safety concerns that so many New Yorkers have. And let me be clear, defund the police is the wrong approach for New York City,” said Yang.
Andrew Yang suggested reforming the country’s policing methods, which will include forming anti-violence units within the community. These units will be used to enforce safety, by searching for mischievous elements and preventing them from further creating trouble.
“These are some of the practices that would help make our people safer, but you have to start by saying to the police very clearly that you are vital to our city’s recovery because there is no recovery without public safety,” Yang stated.
The issue of police funding is a hotly debated topic today and an issue that is not very easy to solve. We do understand that crime can only be prevented if society starts from the root by giving young people better options in life. We know that the world is a better place when compassion takes over violence. However, evil is everywhere today and sometimes force is necessary to prevent or pacify that which could hurt innocent citizens.
The best thing to do is to improve the training of the police force. Perhaps they can revise their ways of handling and de-escalating threatening individuals. Providing them knowledge and training is of utmost importance and that too will require a great deal of funding.
Lockheed Martin Withdraws F-16 Crew from Iraqi Air Base
Due to recent militia rocket attacks, U.S. defense contractor Lockheed Martin will withdraw their F-16 fighter jets’ maintenance crew from Balad Air Base in Iraq. Balad is the base of the Iraqi Air Force and is situated in the Sunni Triangle, 40 miles north of the capital city of Baghdad.
“In coordination with the U.S. government and with employee safety as our top priority, Lockheed Martin is relocating our Iraq-based F-16 team. “We value our partnership with the Iraqi Air Force and will continue to work with the Iraq and U.S. governments to ensure mission success going forward,” Lockheed said in an official statement.
Back in February 2020, Lockheed also pulled out their workers from the same airbase after top Iranian commander Maj. Gen. Qasim Soleimani was killed in a U.S. drone strike in Baghdad. Fears of retribution and prolonged conflict with Iran, prompted Lockheed to secure their team under the State Department’s guidance.
For the past months, other federal contractors have already withdrawn from the region. This information was divulged in a Defense Department Inspector General report that was published recently. There is a huge possibility, according to sources, that Lockheed will continue to assist the Iraqi air force remotely.
Back in November last year, the White House made an announcement that thousands of troops will be withdrawn from Iraq and Afghanistan while a force of 2,500 crews will remain in both countries. Donald Trump’s administration back then, wanted all remaining American troops out by the spring of 2021.
In an interview with the media, national security adviser Robert O’Brien said “by May, it is President Trump’s hope that they will all come home safely — and in their entirety. I want to reiterate that this policy is not new. This has been the president’s policy since he took office.”
About 7,000 American service members were killed since the war in the middle east commenced as a result of the 9/11 attacks on American soil. During his presidential campaign in 2016, Donald Trump made a promise to end the conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan.
He delivered well during his term, however, the process is a complicated one that requires a lot of effort. Aside from the fact that a total pullout of troops would take a long time to undertake, there are still many legitimate dangers to contend with, even during less chaotic times in the middle east.
Search Our Site
News2 months ago
Kamala Harris Says the Last Thing You Want to Hear From Gov’t, Then Sparks More Anger
News2 months ago
Psaki Gets Hit With a Hunter Biden Question, Her Answer Fails In Every Possible Way
News2 months ago
Joe Biden Immediately Gives His Handlers Nightmares After Appearing Confused at Times During First Presser
News2 months ago
Heavily Armed Antifa Rioters Descend On Oregon State Capitol
News2 months ago
Buckle Up: Trump Makes an Announcement About Himself and the Border
News2 months ago
Biden’s Massive Lie Has His Nose Growing Bigger Than Pinocchio
News1 month ago
Looks Like Biden and Fauci Botched the Vaccine Roll-Out
News2 weeks ago
Biden Official Confirms Plans to Ban Fried Chicken and Grape Drink